Ending Probationary Employment Without Termination Notice
A Supreme Court (of the Philippines) jurisprudence suggest this.
For years, employers are on their toes to ensure that the sixth month of employment of probationary employees are monitored to ensure no unqualified proby employees will be regularized. Likewise, proper documentation is considered a must for the following:
- Discussion of employment standards/expectation levelling
- Job description
- Performance appraisal
- Employment contracts and
- Observance of twin notice rule
This is to ensure the decision to end an employee’s probationary contract will not be construed as whimsical.
But a Supreme Court jurisprudence about a case of a supervisor who failed to qualify as a permanent employee is rather interesting.
On the 6th month, the Supervisor was not allowed to time in and as a result, he sued the company for illegally dismissing him. But the court says there is no termination or dismissal but rather an expiration of his 6 month probationary contract.
This decision of the NLRC was upheld by the Court of Appeals which says :
” Even assuming, arguendo, that petitioner was not informed of the reasonable standards required of him by Middleby, the same is not crucial because there is no termination to speak of but rather expiration of contract. Petitioner loses sight of the fact that his employment was probationary, contractual in nature, and one with a
definite period. At the expiration of the period stipulated in the contract, his appointment was deemed terminated and a notice or termination letter informing him of the non-renewal of his contract was not necessary.
While probationary employees enjoy security of tenure such that they cannot be removed except for just cause as provided by law, such protection extends only during the period of probation. Once that period expired, the constitutional protection could no longer be invoked. Legally speaking, petitioner was not illegally dismissed. His contract merely expired. “
The Supreme Court also upheld the decision made by both NLRC and Court of appeals:
G.R. No. 149859 June 9, 2004
..But we have ruled in Manlimos et al VS NLRC that this constitutional protection ends on the expiration of the probationary period. On that date, the parties are free to either renew or terminate their contract of employment. Manlimos concluded that “(t)his development has rendered moot the question of whether there was a just cause for the dismissal of the petitioners xxx.”
To get a grasp of this case, read the complete text of the decision here or copy paste this address to your browser: http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2004/jun2004/gr_149859_2004.html
3 Responses to “Ending Probationary Employment Without Termination Notice”
Leave a Reply
Twitter
Tumblr
Facebook
LinkedIn
YouTube
wow! so there’s no more need to send a 30-day notice to the proby employee?
cebloggers last blog post..Ceblogger Is Now On Twitter
WOW!
All along i thought that if walang ginawang action ang either party lalo na ang company after the 6 month probi period is that the probi employee is deemed to have passed that evaluation period and he/she automatically becomes a regular employee.
But i thought that the government or most decisions are in favor of labor or to the employee?
I think this is not fair for the probi employee. Where is due process?
MiGss last blog post..Has Nokia abandoned the N82?
The employers should still be on their toes. Remember that the bone of contention here by the Supreme Court is if the employee was terminated before or after the expiration of proby period. i think the court will rule in favor of the employee had the company not able to stop him from reporting for work.
Furthermore, the court saw his records of performance. It was really bad. More important than the technicality of the law, the court judged justly based on the available records of bad performance of the employee and the patience showed by the company in giving him a chance to finish his contract inspite of his poor showing.
Justice prevailed.